Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an charming small “playful character”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a sizeable but fiercely protective companion. Another whale, Zephyr has “endless energy” and sways like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “loving presence” with a heart of gold.
A group of thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canadian entertainment facility have been entangled in a struggle between a closed attraction, government authorities and welfare campaigners.
But those most familiar with the whales say the heated discussion over their future often ignores the individual traits of the whales who, after spending their lives in enclosed habitats, have been carefully observed by the people who work with them regularly.
After the Canadian government disallowed the transfer of the belugas to a foreign facility, the embattled amusement park near Niagara Falls where they are housed threatened to put them down unless the authorities covers the upkeep of their survival. The nation’s fisheries minister has rejected that demand, placing the 30 whales in an increasingly precarious circumstance.
Scientists say that beluga whales’ neuroanatomy, along with their sound replication, problem solving and communal behavior suggest they are deeply intelligent mammals – something a former trainer learned personally.
She spent several years as a marine mammal specialist, a position that required gaining confidence of the sea creatures.
“Developing those connections over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of love. At the beginning, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so extraordinary and rewarding.”
The trainer knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was even so astounded by the subtleties and quirks in their dispositions. She cultivated a particular love for a pair of whales with different temperaments.
“Eve accepted me. The other made me earn it,” she said. “Each altered the way I understand bonding.”
Burgess’s connection with the whales evolved against a backdrop of increasing societal concern to their captivity.
During her tenure at the attraction, seven belugas and the park’s one killer whale, Kiska, succumbed. In total, nineteen belugas have died at the park since recent years, a number which the park ascribes to expected lifespan, but which activists say indicates the substandard environment in which they were kept.
The facility did not open to the public over the summer, but the former trainer says she saw with her own eyes effects of the cessation. “Concrete is falling apart from the tanks because they’re falling apart and not being maintained. The whales are curious and so they grab fragments and navigate with chunks in their jaws. It’s heartbreaking to see.”
The park did not comment to a inquiry, but previously asserted: “The whales … get far higher quality veterinary services and 24/7 supervision than any human in the United Kingdom, or elsewhere.”
The former employee was dismissed from the facility in early March following the passing of a beluga, an sick beluga the park staff had to humanely kill. She said the park believed particulars of the incident were disclosed to the news outlets and she was released soon after.
The uncertainty over the whales’ fate has left her and other caretakers in despair. She says the facility’s ultimatum to kill its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “extremely difficult” endeavor, adding any attempts to put down even a single beluga would require “considerable personnel”, equipment and heavy equipment.
“There’s no way in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.
She advocates for requests for the whales to be taken right away from the facility, with its crumbling tanks and dwindling staff.
In the autumn, the nation’s government official denied a proposal to transfer the whales to China.
“To approve the application would have meant a ongoing existence in confinement and a reversion to display for amusement,” the minister stated. “As Canadians, we know that belugas should be in the ocean, not in tanks for our amusement. I could not in good conscience approve an transfer that would prolong the situation these belugas have experienced.”
But Burgess said the official’s comments indicate a wider misunderstanding of the circumstances of living conditions for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.
“The public needs to understand these are whales that have lived entirely in confinement and they will need constant supervision for the foreseeable future,” she said. “The public just don’t realize that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘end operations’.”
As officials work to find a solution, proposals have been put forward, some of which have questionable practicality. One proposal called for the belugas to be released into the open waters of northern regions – where whales are a key source of nourishment for local populations.
A planned refuge in the province of eastern Canada, which recently received regulatory clearance, has shown to be most controversial. The prospective location, which includes 100 acres of penned in ocean, doesn’t yet exist. Advocates remain positive that it could ultimately represent a sustainable solution for a number of the whales.
But, the former trainer says, among staff she’s consulted, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “merely an untested concept” in the whales’ future.
Some experts say the possibility of a sanctuary represents a changing attitudes away from captive facilities and could represent a workable approach in the short term.
An official, director of the plan, said the site will mimic the mental engagement and feeding regimen the whales receive from specialists, albeit in a much larger environment. He said after the health of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|